It is a well-known proverb that to err is human and to forgive is divine. Humans make mistakes all the time, and a lot of time, it is unintentional. Therefore, the guilty might act godlike and forgive the wrongdoer based on the intent. But other times, it does not happen; when mistakes cause serious and unforgivable harm, taking action becomes imperative.
The same can happen in the field of medicine as well. In instances of mistakes causing injury, the law protects the people from intentional or unintentional harm, causing permanent loss. Two very terms in this regard are negligence and malpractice.
In our daily life, you might have used the terms negligence and malpractice synonymously without paying much attention to what they are. But when filing for personal injury claims, malpractice and negligence have a considerable difference with considerably dissimilar repercussions.
The difference does not depend much on what happened to the patient but on how it affects your case. If you recently received a poor standard of medical service or became a victim of a wrong procedure by a nurse or a doctor, understanding the difference between the two terms becomes significantly huge.
Nevertheless, whether it is negligence or malpractice and regardless of their difference, the party most affected is the patient. But, when you file for medical negligence or malpractice claim against a health professional, your chances of proving your claim elevate with proper homework.
Defining Medical Malpractice and Negligence
Before defining medical negligence, you must know what negligence is in general. Negligence is when a person or company’s careless and reckless actions caused harm to you. If you are filing a negligence case, you and your injury lawyer must prove the four elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages.
Medical negligence: Medical negligence is when the party causing harm belongs to the medical profession. Therefore, you might say that a hospital, doctor, or nurse failed to provide you the standard of care that they were responsible for.
Thus, the negligence of these standards of care required of a professional in normal circumstances is a cause for legal action. The example may include surgical errors, failure to recognize the symptoms or the wrong diagnosis, and objects left inside the body during the surgery.
Differences between Negligence and Malpractice
- Intentional vs. unintentional:
The most important distinguishing factor difference between negligence and malpractice is the intent of the offender. Negligence happens as a result of an accidental mistake causing harm to the patient. Medical malpractice is when the person in charge knowingly did not follow through with the procedural requirements and caused an injury.
- Avoidable and Unavoidable:
Another difference lies in the preventability of the harm. Unintentional damage may be out of the bounds of the medical professional as they don’t know the repercussions.
But the case of medical malpractice is quite different, even if you may say that no malicious intent got involved. However, there was a chance to prevent the harm by carefully taking suitable measures.
- Proving intentional recklessness:
When filing a suit, the most significant difference between medical negligence and a malpractice suit is that you must prove it for deliberate recklessness. The resultant charge for medical malpractice is much more severe than for negligence.
- Claims from malpractice vs. negligence
General negligence: For general negligence, you will file a personal injury claim which is also the most common claim. A personal injury claim for negligence goes to the civil court. The lawsuit only applies to situations where the harm resulted due to carelessness in contrast to intentional injury.
- Medical negligence and malpractice claims
On the contrary, when you leave the hospital in the worst situation, unlike your expectations. You must have proof that it was due to the negligence of medical practitioners to file a suit for medical negligence. The claims include surgical errors, misdiagnosis.
For malpractice, there are standards of practice that come into play. Suppose you can prove that the medical practitioner did not follow the measures in place for patient treatment. In that case, you can go forwards with a medical malpractice suit.
Conclusion
As we mentioned in the opening statement that to err is human. Humans make errors all the time. Some harms are forgivable, but others have serious repercussions, hence, require strict action.
In case of negligence, both the patient and doctor can make an unintentional mistake. There can be both intentional and accidental negligence. For instance, there is a chance that the patient’s body reacted to the treatment they received instead of a failure on the part of the medical professional.
Often, this negligence happens due to a lack of communication between professional staff and patients. Other instances are when the doctors and nurses fail to communicate among themselves properly.
The human body is highly complex, and it might be challenging to understand it completely. Therefore, there is a need to give doctors some leeway to perform the treatments without fear of being sued for medical negligence.
I’m a 20-something stay-at-home mother and wife. I have an amazing husband, a beautiful daughter, two loving dogs, and a lazy cat. I wouldn’t change my life for anything! I love to read, listen to music, cook and blog!
Speak Your Mind